U.S. Federal Reserve betting it will avoid central banks' past errors

LONDON -- The Federal Reserve is poised to raise interest rates Wednesday for the first time in 9 1/2 years.

See Full Article

It may not take so long to know whether its decision was correct.

History is filled with cases, from the Fed in the 1930s to the European Central Bank in 2011, when central banks raised rates prematurely, sometimes with dire consequences. Raising rates or otherwise tightening credit too soon can slow borrowing, jolt confidence and choke growth.

When the global financial system started buckling in 2007, central banks cut rates to fight the worst economic catastrophe since the 1930s. As the crisis escalated in late 2008, many rates were slashed to record lows. The Fed cut its benchmark rate to near zero.

Mindful of the risks of higher rates and of the U.S. economy's lingering weaknesses, some economists have suggested that the Fed could wait a bit longer before raising rates, especially with inflation still low amid slumping oil and commodity prices. In a survey of top academic economists, the University of Chicago found that while 48 per centfavoured a rate hike, 36 per cent felt the Fed should hold off.

Andrew Levin of Dartmouth College is among those who think the Fed is acting too soon.

"The economy is not that close to normal yet," Levin says. "Inflation has been persistently falling short of the Fed's target."

Levin notes, too, that while the unemployment rate is a low 5 per cent, millions without jobs have given up looking for one. Levin says employers would have to add 200,000 jobs a month for at least another year to restore the job market's health.

For any central bank, the hardest task is to continually straddle a delicate balance:

Keeping rates too low for too long can inflate asset bubbles as investors seek returns that are higher -- but riskier -- than returns on government debt. Low rates can also weaken the ability of central banks to combat a new crisis or recession.

But equally, central bankers must take care not to increase rates too soon. Since the global financial crisis, several central banks, from Israel's to New Zealand's, have raised rates only to have to reverse course soon after.

Chair Janet Yellen summed it up in a speech Dec. 2. Yellen said delaying a first increase too long might later compel the Fed to raise rates faster than it would like.

"An abrupt tightening would risk disrupting financial markets and perhaps even inadvertently push the economy into recession," she said. "Holding the federal funds rate at its current level for too long could also encourage excessive risk-taking and thus undermine financial stability."

Here are some examples when history suggests central banks should have waited longer to tighten credit.


In 1936-37, during the Great Depression era, the Fed sought to normalize its policies by increasing the amount of money banks had to hold as reserves. Many blame that decision, along with a tougher budgetary stance from the U.S. government, for helping prolong the Depression. The economy fell back into a brutal recession in which around 2.5 million Americans lost jobs.

By 1938, President Franklin Roosevelt reverted back to the expansionist policies associated with the New Deal that he had been implementing since 1933. And the Fed rescinded the increased reserve requirement. The economy then enjoyed a spectacular recovery, helped by wartime spending.

In a 2012 speech, Charles Evans, head of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, warned of a "natural tendency" for policymakers to want to undo super-low rates.

"Such errors happened in 1937 when the Fed prematurely withdrew accommodation," Evans noted.


Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman during the 2008 crisis, was a keen student of Japan's experience after the bursting of a stock and housing bubble in 1990. A quarter-century later, Japan still confronts the repercussions of that shock, notably deflation, or falling prices.

In August 2000, barely a year after the Bank of Japan adopted a zero rate policy, it raised rates for the first time in a decade. It justified that move by noting that confidence was returning and prices were rising. But a few months later, the central bank was compelled to cut rates again as Japan's economy slid back into recession and prices fell again.

Japan's experience reflects the risks of raising rates when inflation is negligible, as it now is in the United States.


The European Central Bank, which sets rates for the 19 countries that use the euro, is enacting a huge stimulus program intended to ease borrowing rates. The ECB's program marks a sharp policy reversal. In 2011, the ECB raised rates twice, boosting its benchmark rate to 1.50 per cent. The bank, then led by Jean-Claude Trichet, said it needed to reduce inflation pressures in the eurozone.

By year's end, the ECB, now led by Mario Draghi, changed course as the rate hikes and export-sapping appreciation of the euro pushed the economy back into recession. The region was also fighting a debt crisis that threatened the euro itself.

Critics regard the 2011 rate increases as a major policy mistake.

Paul Wiseman contributed to this report from Washington.


Latest Economic News

  • Can Facebook restore public trust after privacy scandal?

    Economic CTV News
    CHICAGO -- It's a scandal of privacy, politics and an essential ingredient of business success -- public trust. Facebook is confronting a costly, embarrassing public relations debacle after revelations that Cambridge Analytica may have misused data from some 50 million users to try to influence elections. Source
  • China tells U.S. it will defend interests after Trump tariffs

    Economic CTV News
    BEIJING -- China's newly appointed economic czar told U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Saturday that Beijing is ready to defend its interests after U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to slap tariffs on nearly US$50 billion in Chinese imports. Source
  • The biggest loser in a trade war between China and the U.S.? It's you (but don't worry about it)

    Economic CBC News
    The old adage tells us no one wins a trade war. So, the next logical question is: Who loses? Well, the short answer is — you do. Consumers have been the clear beneficiaries of globalization. Cheap stuff has flooded into North America at a historically unprecedented rate. Source
  • What's being done with your data: Experts ask, shouldn't someone get this under control?

    Economic CBC News
    Now that Facebook, Google and Amazon know pretty much everything about us, how they're using that information is drawing the focus of politicians throughout the Western world, asking in effect: "Shouldn't something be done about this?" Source
  • Bombardier executive compensation hits US$33.4 million in 2017

    Economic CTV News
    MONTREAL -- Bombardier's executive compensation rose seven per cent to US$33.4 million in 2017, according to a circular released ahead of the company's May 3 annual meeting. The increase comes after a year marked by improved results, but also by the Airbus takeover of the C Series program without the company having to pay a single cent. Source
  • U.S. sets May 1 tariff threat on Canada, Mexico amid rush to speed up NAFTA talks

    Economic CBC News
    The United States has just applied additional pressure in its rush to get a new NAFTA agreement within several weeks, establishing a May 1 deadline, after which Canada and Mexico would face tariffs on steel and aluminum. Source
  • United Airlines gives $10,000 voucher to traveller on overbooked flight

    Economic CBC News
    A passenger who was bumped off a full flight has scored the maximum prize — a $10,000 US travel voucher. A spokesperson for United Airlines confirmed Friday that a passenger got the big voucher, but he didn't name the person. Source
  • Canadian retailers could be boosted by a U.S. trade battle with China

    Economic CTV News
    MONTREAL -- U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to impose tariffs on up to US$60 billion of Chinese imports could help Canadian retailers by further easing cross-border shopping, even though a full-fledged trade war between the world's two economic superpowers would damage Canada's economy, experts say. Source
  • CRA audits just 5 Canadians out of hundreds of RBC Panama Papers accounts

    Economic CBC News
    Two years after it took aim at hundreds of Royal Bank clients exposed in the Panama Papers leak, the Canada Revenue Agency has decided just five cases require an audit. That's because most of the offshore accounts it unearthed ended up belonging to foreigners, the CRA says. Source
  • Manulife mix-up: $170K retirement nest egg transferred from account without warning

    Economic CTV News
    A Toronto woman’s retirement nest egg was transferred out of her RRSP account after Manulife Financial wired more than $170,000 to a foreign third-party stock transfer company, putting the funds in limbo amid an ongoing spat with the financial services giant. Source